Tenth Crusader Christian Bush -3

AGAIN this tenth crusader Bush mouthed the word crusade on Februrary 16, 2002.   "I want to tell you something, we've got no better friends than Canada. (Applause.) They stand with us in this incredibly important crusade."  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Crusade

For Alexander Cockburn,  Bush tenth crusade was the continuation of the Ninth Crusade. 
"Islamic fanatics flew those planes a year ago and here we are with a terrifying alliance of Judaeo-Christian fanatics, conjoined in their dreams of the recovery of the Holy Lands of the West Bank, Judaea and Samaria. War on Terror? It's back to the late thirteenth century, picking up where Prince Edward left off with his ninth crusade after St Louis had died in Tunis with the word Jerusalem on his lips." Alexander Cockburn, "The Tenth Crusade," Counterpunch, September 7, 2002. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Crusade


James Pinkerton, think that Bush is a Twelfth Crusader.   "And now, in 2003, the Americans, the Twelfth Crusaders. The West is no longer 'Christendom,' but we, as first cousins to the Europeans, retain the old faith and bring new kinds of idealism, such as democracy and human rights. But the Crusader spirit is still there; it's still about bringing civilization and salvation of a backward people. As the born-again George W. Bush says, 'This is about good vs. evil.'" James Pinkerton, "Century In, Century Out - It's Crusade Time," Newsday, December 4, 2003, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Crusade

So this a thumb-nail  sketch of the nine-hundred years  history of crusades by the European Christians and American Christians who joined their European Christian brothers in the Crusade of World One and are  now leading the 21st century Crusade against Muslim World on behalf of all the Christians of the world.

View from any angle, White European Christians launched these so called crusades to plunder the people of the color Muslims and their own white Europeans.  Different slogans have been used by the crusaders to mask the real motives.

Why did the American not join the early crusades and why did they wait until the Crusade of World War One. The reasons are obvious. U.S. did not exist on the world map until 18th century. Second, world occupying powers Christian France and Christian Britain did not allow the United States to join the crusade for another obvious reason. Participation in every crusade brought loot in the lap of the White European Christian crusaders. It was the first time  that rift in the Christian world at the time of World War One forced the  world wide Christian occupiers Great Britain and France to beg the support of America to save their world-wide occupation against Christian Germany.  With World War One crusade, the era of Christian Great Britain and France world wide occupation really ended. It was only the matter of few decades that the Christian world capitals of world wide occupation shifted from Paris and London to Washington. The occupation baton was passed to the American leadership to destroy the Muslim World by occupation and subversion.  

And today, no Muslim country can claim to be sovereign except Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Malaysia and Sudan. Washington rules all other Muslim countries through its political pimps. The recent example is of Pakistan where a nuclear-pimp general is ordered by Christian crusader Bush to take off his uniform and to stand naked in the global square; he did. His name is Gen. Musharraf.  General, you have no shame. In stead of dying by a global tyrant and terrorist Bush, you preferred to die as a traitor.  History will unmask your share in the event of Sept. 11.  History will unmask your capitalization of the events of Sept. 11.

After conquering almost entire Muslim world, wars of terror continue by the White European and their cousin America.  Like the past terrorists named crusaders, present crusader launches a war of terror. It should not be surprising.  As the crusaders used Christianity to gain political and economic gains, tenth crusader Bush uses democratization of the Muslim World to gain political gains. Is Bush a terrorist? Yes, according to the definition of US Federal Bureau of Investigation, Bush himself is a terrorist.

"Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."  

"Read the sentence carefully. You didn't hear it on any corporate media newscast since 9/11. It's the official US FBI definition of terrorism.  In its official definition, the FBI does not limit terrorism to stateless individuals or groups. In its official definition, the FBI does not suggest that terrorism cannot be perpetrated by the leader of a nation state. But even more amazing is that the official FBI definition of terrorism describes exactly what George Bush did in the aftermath of the attacks of 9/11!

"George W. Bush, in his unprovoked attack against the sovereign nation of Iraq, openly violated the UN Charter, to which the US is a signatory.  The Charter's core principles contained in Article 2(4) and Article 51 prohibit one nation from attacking another except in self-defense or with the authority of the U.N. In effect, George Bush launched an unlawful use of force against persons and property.

"The invasion launched by George W. Bush was heralded by the most frightening and powerful use of force and military violence in recent history. His Shock and Awe bombardment of Baghdad was designed to intimidate and coerce the government as well as the civilian population of that nation to change its existing leadership. That, in itself, was a political objective.
"The purpose of the invasion and ensuing occupation of Iraq was to replace the existing dictatorship with an American-backed form of democracy that would not permit the emergence of a government headed by the majority Shia religious leadership.  These motives were unquestionably political and social.

"So, what part of the FBI definition of "terrorism" do the voters of the United States not understand?  And what acts of terrorism as defined by the FBI do the voters of the United States not recognize?  Is there any doubt at all that the Bush administration committed acts of terrorism when it unlawfully used force and violence against the nation of Iraq to intimidate and coerce its government and the civilian population, in furtherance of the Bush/PNAC political and social objectives.

"Therefore, by any definition, if George W. Bush is guilty of terrorism, he can accurately be identified as a TERRORIST. And if he is truly a terrorist, it is only fitting that George W. Bush be scrutinized in terms of his success in that capacity.  What is his standing among the other murderous terrorist activity in the world today? " WHY GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORLD'S LEADING TERRORIST! MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL
WHO'S THE LEADING TERRORIST OF ALL? http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/george_w__bush_-_world_s_leadi.html

Jafar Syed (MA,LLB) is a researcher on International Affairs based in New York